Dr. Niamtu’s Weblog

….on cosmetic facial surgery

“Botax”: The Proposed Tax on Cosmetic Surgery

tax

Ahhhh, the federal government has found another unturned stone to tax a small portion of the American public, the cosmetic surgery tax.

This source of revenue is considered unfair and excessive by most individuals.  All cosmetic surgery procedures would include a 10% tax.  This sounds good for the Feds, but bad for the consumers.  Now, of course, the readers of this blog will say “of course he does not want a cosmetic surgery tax, it will affect his income”!  Well you are correct on that, but there is actually a bigger picture of unfairness.

First of all, the Federal Government (or State Governments) do not participate in any insurance with these procedures because cosmetic surgery is elective.  Patients are already paying for this with after tax dollars, so now they have to pay tax on taxed income.  Also, as seen in other states that have initiated a cosmetic surgery tax, patients simply go to another state to have their surgery.  This does nothing to support local economies and takes business away from the surgeons in that state.  An additional negative about this tax is that it discriminates against females as they are the largest consumers of cosmetic surgery. Other consumers, regardless of gender, save hard for cosmetic procedures and may be priced out of the market.

Another possibility of this type of tax is that it can encourage “back room” surgical procedures.  This is one of the arguments for legal abortion.  When it is illegal, patients have had fatal or damaging outcomes by using “back room” not qualified medical personnel for treatments.  A further tax on cosmetic surgery or any surgery for that matter can encourage non qualified medical treatment.

When the Fed decides to tax a luxury, where does it stop?  Should there be an additional tax on high quality running shoes, top shelf alcoholic beverages, the best lawnmowers, etc?

Patients pay tax on the money they use for cosmetic surgery and the surgeon pays tax on the income he or she makes from the surgery.  That would seem to be enough.

To find out more about cosmetic facial surgery by Dr. Joe Niamtu in Richmond, Virginia visit www.lovethatface.com

Joe Niamtu, III DMD, FAACS

Cosmetic Facial Surgery

Richmond, Virginia

October 27, 2009 Posted by Dr. Joe Niamtu | Cosmetic Surgery Tax | , | No Comments Yet

The Diva Lift: Facelift for Full Figured Females

div

Click above to view full text article

In this day and age, it is a bit disgusting that some surgeons go out and makes a minor change to a procedure that has been around for a century and “invents” some new miracle procedure.  There are bunches of these types of docs out there.

I recently detailed some of my work that involved modifications of traditional facelifts in patients with high body mass index (BMI) in an article in Cosmetic Surgery Times.  The Body Mass Index is a formula that gives a number based on the height and weight of the patient.  Overweight patients (full figured) present many differences when compared to the average facelift patient.  This magazine goes out to cosmetic surgeons from multiple specialties and frequently details new or innovative approaches to cosmetic surgery.  The editor, Teresa McNulty, and I discussed a modified facelift that I was performing on full figured women with great results.  She was impressed with my surgical results and suggested the name of the article be the “Diva Lift”.  So there, that is how the name came about and not as a self anointed marketing ploy on my behalf.

What is the “Diva Lift”?

First of all, the word Diva, until the past decade when it became descriptive of any star female singer, was commonly used to describe full figured opera singers.  Facelift surgery is a very large part of my cosmetic facial surgery practice and one of my favorite procedures.  I enjoy facelift surgery because I think it is the most dramatic cosmetic surgery procedure that exists for several reasons.  First of all, you can hide mediocre surgery on boobs, bellies and buts, but you can’t hide facial surgery.  Secondly, as we age, big changes occur in our cheeks, face and neck that cannot be disguised with clothing.  Another important thing about facelift surgery is it is probably the most noticed surgery as patients look at their face daily more than any other body part and those we interact with see our face more than other parts of our body.  Facelift is the ultimate rejuvenation procedure.  Patients simply feel bad when their face ages and feel better when it is firm and tight.

 Facelift patients come in all size, shapes and genders and unlike some operations, no two are the same.  Also many surgeons perform different variations of facelift surgery.  Like anything else, there is a right way and wrong way to perform facelift surgery.  Many surgeons perform time tested “textbook facelift surgery” while others get lazy and adopt shortcuts that affect the results and longevity.  Worst is the current rage of “minimally invasive facelifts” that are merely marketing ploys of corporate franchises.  These lifts claim to be revolutionary or miraculous and lure patients with promises of maximum results with minimum downtime and cost.  Note to consumers!  You get what you pay for.  I don’t mean this only in terms of cost (because some of these miracle lifts cost more than my larger lifts) but in terms of recovery.  If a patient over 40 years desires comprehensive facial rejuvenation that will last over 10 years, then they need a longer recovery.  Two weeks of recovery is not too much to endure to reverse decades of aging and skin sagging.  To truly address the deep tissues of the front of the neck and cheeks, incisions must be made under the chin and in front of and behind the ears.  These incisions are well hidden and almost unnoticeable when performed by experienced surgeons.  These trendy “minimally invasive” facelifts only use a smaller incision in front of the ear and this severely limits the effect of the lift.  When you perform facelift surgery correctly and comprehensively, it requires tightening of the neck muscles under the chin (called the platysma muscle).  It also requires tightening of the deep layers of the cheeks (known as the SMAS which stands for superficial musculoaponeurotic system) with numerous sutures for a secure and lasting result.  Finally, the incision behind the ear (which is hidden in the hair) is absolutely imperative to truly address the excess skin of the chin, face and neck.  When a surgeon shortcuts any of these incisions or approaches, the patient gets short changed.  The result will simply be less dramatic and for sure will be less long lasting.  A three to five day recovery may sound like a great thing, but it is a short cut.  To address all the important structures, a recovery closer to two weeks is necessary.  Most facelifts with short recoveries will unfortunately also have short results and will begin to relapse within the first 2 years.

The “Diva Lift” (and I must admit that I hate to “name” a facelift is far from a short cut.  In fact, it is a more aggressive facelift because these overweight patients have more fat and skin and need more surgery to obtain a natural and long lasting result.

 

How is the “Diva Lift” different from conventional facelifts?

 

The main differences of the “Diva Lift” are modifications of traditional facelifts to address the excess fat and skin.  The first difference is that these procedures require a higher level of liposuction of the superficial and deep fat when compared to a normal weight patient.  Also, deep fat accumulations are addressed under the chin and the front of the neck.  By reducing or sculpting this deep neck fat, the surgeon can obtain a much more defined neck after the facelift compared to facelifts that don’t involve this deep fat. After the superficial and deep fat are reduced or removed, the neck muscles in the front of the neck (platysma) are tightened.  The “Diva Lift” also involves a higher level of “liposculpture” where instead of just removing the fat under the skin; it is sculpted to provide youthful contours of the jaw line, jowls and neck.  Full figure patients also have much more fat in their cheeks and neck and the “Diva Lift” specifically address this to a greater level than the conventional facelift.

Besides the deep fat in the neck, the way that the deep tissues of the cheeks are managed is critical in larger patients.  In many patients, a common surgical technique called “plication” involves tightening the deep fat and tissues in the cheeks by folding them over.  In a thinner patient this technique may be desirable as it add some facial volume, whereas in the full figure patient the goal is to reduce some of the cheek volume.  With this in mind, the “Diva Lift” involves a more comprehensive method of treating the deep tissues in the cheeks called “SMASectomy”.  Instead of folding the tissue over on itself like plication surgery, some of the deep tissue is actually removed which not only tightens but slims the face, which is very important in this type of patient.  In the “Diva Lift”, much more time is spent dealing with fat excess than in the conventional facelift.  Also important in this type of lift is the tightening of the backside of the neck muscles (posterior platysma).  Many surgeons omit this step and again, it improves the result and longevity of the lift.  Why doesn’t every surgeon do all of this?  The answer is simple.  It takes time and expertise to competently perform these procedures and some surgeons don’t want to devote the time or do not have the surgical expertise.  The “Diva Lift” is not a facelift for beginning or inexperienced surgeons.

The last step of the “Diva Lift” that varies from conventional facelifts is the excess skin management and incision patterns.  Since the full figured patient has more skin than the average patient, incisions must be slightly larger (but still well hidden) and performed in a certain manner so there is no bunching of the tissue.  These incisions are specially designed as not to be noticeable or make big changes in the patient’s hairline, specifically the sideburn region and the hairline behind the ear.

So, the “Diva Lift” is not a smaller, but rather a larger type of facelift.  It embodies a little more aggressive treatment at each step of the facelift when compared to the average facelift.  It definitely requires more work on the part of the surgeon and perhaps a few more days of recovery for the patient, but the results are worth it.

Some surgeons may read this and say “this is nothing new and Dr. Niamtu is merely doing a larger facelift”.  In some ways they are correct, but it is not simply a larger facelift.  It is a combination of procedures that must be addressed in a specific way with careful attention to details as the full figured facelift patient requires a different type of surgery.  I am the first to admit that I have not invented or discovered anything new.  I have merely modified common facelift techniques to better serve the full figured patient and have obtained impressive results with this technique that have been natural appearing and long lasting.

There may be nothing new under the sun, but there are surely ways to innovate existing procedures to better benefit selected patient populations.

To find out more about facelift surgery by Dr. Niamtu in Richmond, Virginia visit www.lovethatface.com

Joe Niamtu, III DMD

Cosmetic Facial Surgery

Richmond, Virginia

www.lovethatface.com

October 26, 2009 Posted by Dr. Joe Niamtu | Facelift Surgery, New Cosmetic Surgery Technology | , , , | No Comments Yet